Lawmakers demand answers after report reveals ‘blatant’ racial profiling by Michigan border officers

Due to an obscure 100 mile zone law, border officials believe they have the power to conduct warrantless searches in the United States. noted. And, border officials have used this supposed authority to engage in “blatant” racial profiling, the organization continues.

“Although people of Latin American descent make up only 16.8% of the state’s foreign-born population, 85% of non-citizens apprehended by the border patrol were from Latin America. ” said the report. And, an overwhelming number of people arrested by border officials have status. Over 33% are US citizens. An additional 13% have some sort of legal status. “Instead of following its mandate to patrol the Canadian border, Border The patrol arrests people, the vast majority of whom are established, long-term Michigan residents.

“The agency uses” skin codes “to describe those apprehended,” the report also notes. “It is telling that over 96% of those apprehended are recorded as’ Black ‘,’ Dark brown ‘,’ Dark ‘,’ Light brown ‘,’ Medium brown ‘,’ Medium ‘or’ Yellow. “Skin tone” in particular sounds very dated and offensive, by the way.

The ACLU report further noted how local and state law enforcement “plays a key role in helping the border patrol target people of color: nearly half of the border patrol arrests (48, 6%) started with a state or local law enforcement agency that initiated a traffic stop. Michigan State Police are by far responsible for making more contact with the Border Patrol than any other police department, resulting in people being detained and returned to agency custody. federal.

“Even more troubling, the ACLU has identified at least 14 encounters in which local law enforcement detained an individual without suspicion of wrongdoing and then turned him over to CBP officers,” Raskin and Tlaib told Mayorkas. “Such protracted stops are unconstitutional. In 2012, the Supreme Court warned that there were “constitutional problems” when national and local law enforcement agencies “delay the release of detainees for no other reason than to verify their immigration status.” actually had to pay millions in settlements to immigrants unfairly detained in this way.

The report details one disturbing incident in particular, when U.S. resident Arnulfo Gomez and two passengers were pulled over by Michigan State Police, allegedly because of a noisy exhaust pipe. For a while, it looked like they would be allowed to continue, until an officer took note of their accents and said a colleague was nearby with a border officer. This agent then harassed Gomez’s wife, threatening her with arrest. The report says Gomez watched the interaction in terror, fearing that their two U.S. citizen children would see their family torn apart.

Finally, they were allowed to leave. “There was no reason for him to arrest us,” Gomez said in the report. “As soon as he saw that we were dark, he chased us. Then they immediately called the border patrol. Everything that happened to us was wrong. We were targeted simply because we are brown. The Michigan ACLU said in the report that “[u]Unfortunately, this family’s experience is not unique.

“We are deeply disturbed by what appear to be discriminatory abuses of power and the misuse of taxpayer funds,” Raskin and Tlaib continue in their letter to Mayorkas. “DHS must provide a full explanation of exactly how it deals with the issues exposed by the ACLU.” The Michigan ACLU thanked the committee for investigating Mayorkas, say in a statement this “[w]We look forward to DHS’s response to the report and the reforms that flow from this briefing.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *