Mainstream media analysis shows Biden gets more negative coverage than Trump

I show You how To Make Huge Profits In A Short Time With Cryptos!


People who are politically active tend to stick to their own ecosystems, even if we go through mainstream media like the Times or the Post, and CNN, of course. But most Liberals find sites like this because they want to read analysis in line with their own priorities, we watch Maddow, follow the same people on Twitter, and read The Nation.

This makes it easy to get lost in what the “occasional” political consumer sees.

According to a new study covered by the Washington post, the average political news consumer finds much more negative coverage of Joe Biden than that of Donald Trump, a man who handled an epidemic about as badly as he could be and was instrumental in what s turned out to be a failed coup.

According to the Post, a very sophisticated meta-study was conducted regarding the coverage every man received:

Artificial intelligence can now accurately measure negativity. My request,, a data analysis unit of the news company FiscalNote, combed over 200,000 articles – tens of millions of words – from 65 news websites (newspapers, network news and the cable, political publications, news dispatches, etc.) “of coverage. Using algorithms that weight certain adjectives based on their placement in the story, he assessed the coverage Biden received over the years. First 11 months of 2021 and the coverage President Donald Trump got in the first 11 months of 2020.

There is a very important point buried in this last sentence. Most presidents take advantage of a honeymoon period. This study did not cover Trump’s “honeymoon”, it measured Trump’s last year, a year that could only be described as “catastrophic” at a historic level, especially compared to the first year. of Biden which, despite a few setbacks, has been largely a spectacular year. return to “normality”.

And even:

After a slightly positive honeymoon of coverage in the first three months of the year, Biden’s press for the past four months has been as bad as – and for some time worse than – the coverage Trump received for the same four months of 2020.

The article then goes on to highlight some of the most devastating events that have occurred in Trump’s past year, culminating in the first violent transfer of power in our history, all in relation to Biden’s first year – this year :

And yet Trump got as favorable, if not better, media coverage than Biden’s today. Of course, Biden had his issues, with the Delta variant, Afghanistan, and inflation. But the economy is rebounding impressively, he signed major legislation and he restored a certain decency, calm and respect for democratic institutions.

We need a skeptical and independent press. But how about being supporters of democracy? The country is in an existential struggle between self-governance and an authoritarian alternative. And we in the news media have collectively accorded equal, if not slightly more favorable, treatment to authoritarians.

If this was just another article written by an analyst who “reviewed” the documents and came to their own conclusion, we probably wouldn’t give it much weight. It is extremely difficult to eliminate our own biases and, as individuals, to assess the biases of meta-media. But it is not such a difficult task for certain kinds of computer programs which can calculate certain words and certain subjects.

It is truly disturbing that such a sophisticated study produced such compelling results. Yes, the mainstream press must remain neutral in reporting the facts. This in no way amounts to neutralizing positive coverage over negative government coverage, or a broad assumption that the tragedy in Afghanistan is just as glaring as the New York tragedy in the first wave of COVID. The one Jared Kushner called the Blue State problem, one for which Trump has said he takes “no responsibility.”

There is something very bad in the American media if Joe Biden receives more negative media attention from his – largely successful – freshman than the devastating trail Trump has traced in his senior year. Maintaining a democratic republic is hard enough, we don’t need a “hard-working” media outlet to avoid sounding partisan in covering Biden’s success, or clouding over Trump’s absurdity.

Source link