UK judge says smart security cameras violate neighbors’ privacy

Nowadays, it has become easier and cheaper to buy and install smart home security systems for your home. However, the next time you think about installing smart security cameras or even a smart doorbell that can come with a camera, you might want to think twice.

Indeed, in the United Kingdom, a judge ruled that by installing these security systems in his house, Jon Woodard had violated the privacy of his neighbor. According to the BBC report, this happened when Woodard invited his neighbor, Dr Mary Fairhurst, to come to his house to show off his renovations.

As part of the renovations, Woodard installed the Ring doorbell and security camera, which Fairhurst objected to. A series of disputes over the camera ensued, which eventually led to Fairhurst leaving her home.

Since these devices were capable of capturing video and audio (turning off audio was not a feature that was introduced until 2020), and it was found that the cameras could In fact capturing parts of the Fairhurst house like the garden and the parking space, the judge ruled that this was a violation of UK data protection law and UK GDPR.

That being said, that doesn’t mean you can’t protect your home using these systems, but it might be a good idea to make sure that if a video is captured, it should be that of your. own property.

Deposit Gadgets >Home. Learn more about Connected objects, IoT (Internet of Things), Legal, Privacy and Security. Source: bbc

Source link